News
Building VISTA
Photos of VISTA
Images taken with VISTA
Past news
Overview
VISTA is a 4-m class wide field survey
telescope for the southern hemisphere, equipped with a near infrared
camera (1.65 degree diameter field of view at VISTA's nominal pixel size) containing 67 million
pixels of mean size 0.34 arcsec and available broad band filters at Z,Y,J,H,Ks and a narrow band filter at 1.18 micron. A wide field visible camera,
if constructed, could also be used on VISTA.
The telescope has an azimuth-altitude mount, and quasi-Ritchey-Chretien
optics with a fast f/1 primary mirror giving an f/3.25 focus to
the instrument at Cassegrain. The instrument mounts to the rotator
on the back of the primary mirror cell, and includes a wide-field
corrector lens system (3 infrasil lenses), autoguider and active
optics sensors. VISTA is located at ESO's Cerro Paranal Observatory
in Chile (latitude 24° 40' S - see Google satellite picture ) on its own peak (see
picture) about 1500m from the four VLTs and the VST see either
(figure where
VISTA is at top left) or (figure
where VISTA is at bottom right).
The point spread function (PSF) of the telescope+camera system
(including pixels) is designed to have a full width at half maximum
(FWHM) of 0.51 arcsec. Seeing, and other weather realted statistics
for Cerro Paranal are given at ESO's Astroclimatology
of Paranal pages and the VISTA site is expected to have similar
conditions.
The site, telescope aperture, wide field, and high quantum efficiency
detectors will make VISTA the world's outstanding ground based near-IR
survey instrument.
Time available
75% of the VISTA time available to ESO will be available for large
scale public surveys and the remaining 25% for smaller proprietary
surveys. On the assumption that VISTA is unavailable ~10 nights
a year for maintenance the corresponding numbers of nights per year
are Public Surveys: ~236 nights, Proprietary Surveys: ~78 Nights.
In planning surveys it should be realised that the surveys as a
whole (public + proprietary) have to effectively use the range of seeing and sky conditions (sky
brightness, extinction, wind
speed) available, as well as the RA range. One of the roles
of the Public Survey Panel for VISTA will be to ensure that the
final Public surveys form a realistic set in the light of these
constraints.
Information on the conditions at the Cerro Paranal Observatory
can be found on the ESO Astroclimatology
of Paranal pages.
For all observing time at ESO telescopes ESO assume
10 hours per night in odd periods (winter, 1 April to 30 September)
and
8 hours per night in even periods (summer, 1 October to end of February).
These numbers are used at submission time as approximate indications
of time available (but not, for example, when later scheduling allocated
service-mode observations).
Filters
Filter |
plot |
Wavelength |
FWHM |
Comment |
|
at 296K |
micron |
|
Z |
transmission |
0.88 |
0.12 |
manufactured |
Y |
transmission |
1.02 |
0.10 |
in camera |
J |
transmission |
1.25 |
0.18 |
in camera |
H |
transmission |
1.65 |
0.30 |
in camera |
Ks |
transmission |
2.15 |
0.30 |
in camera |
NB1.18 |
plot to be provided |
1.18 |
0.01 |
in camera |
The only moving part in the camera is the filter wheel. With the
current complement of Z, Y, J, H, Ks and NB1.18 filters
there is one filter wheel position available to hold a further set
of 16 filters (1 per detector).
Purchase of other filters are under discussion by various groups
- see VISTA
twiki filters page
Field Distortion
The plate scale varies with distance from the field centre, getting larger from centre to edge, which is why the mean pixel size (of 0.339 arcsec) is quoted.
The rectangular focal plane, when projected onto the sky, suffers barrel distortion. This means that a somewhat larger area of sky is seen by the detectors than if there was no distortion.
A rectangular area of sky when imaged onto the focal plane suffers from pincushion distortion. This means that a somewhat smaller area of focal plane is covered by the sky than if there was no distortion.
The distortions (of order 30 pixels at the edge) therefore increase overlap between adjacent tiles and do need not be considered in observation planning.
Covering an area of sky
The sixteen 2048x2048 pixel IR detectors (Raytheon VIRGO HgCdTe
0.84-2.5 micron) in the camera are not buttable and are arranged
as in the following figure
which shows a diagram of the focal plane as would be seen looking directly down
the camera body (down the Z-axis which on the telescope points towards
the sky). On the sky (in the default instrument rotator position)
+Y corresponds to N, and +X to East.
Below - photograph of the real focal plane.
A single Integration of
length DIT secs (or a coadded series of these known as an Exposure) produces a sparsely sampled image of the sky known as a Pawprint (in red in the following Figure). The area of sky covered by the
pixels of a pawprint is 0.6 sq degrees. For comparison the fields
of view of NICMOS, ISAAC, HAWK-I and WFCAM are shown below in Figure
2 together with a crescent moon.
and an mockup up of a pawprint showing the Moon
To 'fill-in' the gaps between the detectors to produce a single
filled Tile with reasonably uniform
sky coverage the minimum number of pointed observations (with fixed
offsets) required is 6 which is achieved first by observing at 3 positions offset in Y i.e.
so that after 3 positions in Y an area of vertical side 5.275 detector widths (=4+3*0.425) is covered at least twice. This corresponds to 1.017 degrees (61 arcmin) at VISTA's mean pixel size.
There is also a strip at the top and another at the bottom which is only covered once by this tiling pattern. These strips are each 0.475 of a detector height. Each corresponding to 0.092 degrees (5.5 arcmin) at VISTA's mean pixel size.
Then a position shift is made in X as shown below
so that the 2 positions in X cover a horizontal side 7.65 detector widths (=4+3*0.90+0.95) with no strips at the +/-X edges. This corresponds to 1.475 degrees (88.5 arcmin) at VISTA's nominal pixel size. The 3 steps in Y are then repeated at the nex position in X.
So after 3x2=6 steps an area of 5.275x7.65=40.354 detector areas corresponding to
1.017 deg x 1.475deg = 1.501 deg2 sky is (almost)
uniformly covered (by a minimum of 2 pixels) as shown in light green
in the exposure time map below for a filled tile (no jitter).
where dark green = 1, light green = 2, magenta = 3, red = 4, yellow
= 6, in units of the single-pawprint exposure time.
The dark green areas at top and bottom of the plot are each 1.475 deg x 0.092 deg =0.135 sq deg and can be overlapped by corresponding areas from adjacent tiles for many surveys. Assigning
only one of the two 0.092 deg overlap (top & bottom) to each of the two tiles involved in an overlap, the result is that
each tile, when part of a filled larger area, would covers (1.017+0.092) x1.475
= 1.636 deg2 which will be covered at least twice.
Summary of dimensions (unit of 2048 pixel side detecor)
|
in X |
in Y |
Area |
|
det |
det |
sq det |
Pawprint |
|
|
|
Single Detector |
1 |
1 |
1 |
All 16 Single Detectors |
4 |
4 |
16 |
Outer Boundary of (unfilled Pawprint) |
6.70 |
5.275 |
35.343 |
Diagonal (unfilled pawprint) 8.5273 dets |
|
|
|
Tile |
|
|
|
Tile size covered twice |
7.65 |
5.275 |
40.354 |
Tile size at top (+Y) covered once |
7.65 |
0.475 |
3.634 |
Tile size at bottom (-Y) covered once |
7.65 |
0.475 |
3.634 |
Tile size covered twice if one of the two overlaps is matched by a nighbour tile in large survey |
7.65 |
5.75 |
43.988 |
Summary of dimensions (unit of degrees)
|
in X |
in Y |
Area |
Adopted mean pixel size 0.339 arsec |
deg |
deg |
sq deg |
Pawprint |
|
|
|
Single Detector |
0.193 |
0.193 |
0.037 |
All 16 Single Detectors |
|
|
0.595 |
Outer Boundary (unfilled Pawprint) |
1.292 |
1.017 |
|
Diagonal (unfilled pawprint) 1.6445 deg |
|
|
|
Tile |
|
|
|
Tile size all covered twice |
1.475 |
1.017 |
1.501 |
Tile size at top (+Y) covered once |
1.475 |
0.092 |
0.135 |
Tile size at bottom (-Y) covered once |
1.475 |
0.092 |
0.135 |
Tile size covered twice if one of the two overlaps is matched by a nighbour tile in large survey |
1.475 |
1.109 |
1.636 |
Jitter and microsteps
To deal with bad pixels and to determine the sky level a Jitter pattern of exposures at positions each shifted by a small movement
(<30 arcsec) from the reference position will generally be used.
Unlike a microstep the non-integral part of the shifts is any fractional
number of pixels. Each position of a jitter pattern can contain
a microstep pattern.
To better sample the PSF a Microstep
pattern about a reference position can be performed with shifts
specified as a odd number of 0.5 of a pixel (i.e. no integer pixel
shifts), which allows the pixels in the series to be interleaved
in an effort to improve the sampling. Due to distortion, microsteps
should be not larger than 3 arcsec to keep the shifts close to a
half-integer number of pixels across the entire field. The calibration
software will not handle larger microsteps.
Guide stars, wave-front sensor stars, survey area definition
Each integration requires a guide star for the autoguider to use,
and one star each for the two low order wavefront sensors which
are used to adjust the secondary mirror unit to keep focus and image
quality in the fast (f/1) primary beam.
For a given sky area specified with respect to a sky position a
Survey Area Definition Tool (SADT) will lay down the appropriate
grid of pawprints required, and automatically find the guide and
wave front sensor stars to produce (in conjunction with P2PP) the
Observation Blocks (OBs). This tool is not needed to define a VISTA
science program and will be available in Phase II in time for use
by successful proposers.
Estimating On Source Observing Time
For estimating required exposure times the Exposure Time Calculator
(ETC) is given an object of a given magnitude for which it can determine
either a) the signal to noise achieved in a given exposure time
or b) the exposure time needed to achieve a given signal to noise
see Exposure Time Calculator description
page for more detail and the link to the actual ETC.
Estimating Overheads
As with any telescope there are overheads associated with observing.
VISTA is intended to survey quickly, primarily through having a
large field of view, but the actual survey speeds obtained (in good
conditions) will depend on the way in which observations are carried
out.
1) Overheads making a single tile in one filter
Overheads on a tile depend on the adopted combination, and order,
of filter changes, microstepping, jittering, and tiling. As an example
a typical minute spent on the sky in a fixed filter such as Ks might
consist of (6 x [DIT=10 sec] integrations + 1 sec readout), coadd
+ save, 3 sec jitter move, 1 sec guider lock), repeat => 70 sec
elapsed time for 60 sec on sky.
The 'Observing Strategy' section in 'Observing Setup' section of
the Exposure Time Calculator allows you to break a total on-source
time down into a number Ndit of individual Integrations,
each DIT seconds long, with the Ndit*DIT long Exposures repeated Nexp times with a number of jitters, Njitter, and if required
a NxM microstep pattern. The ETC then returns the total on sky time
and the elapsed time so that the overheads are known and the observing
strategy can be adjusted to maximise the survey efficiency
see Exposure Time Calculator description
page for more detail.
However the user will also need to seperately account, by hand, for the overheads 2), 3) and 4) below which are not calculated by the ETC or other available tools):
2) Filter change overheads (not in ETC)
The filter change time depends on the wheel rotation from the last
position but is between 25sec (to move between neighbouring filters)
and 60 sec (to move between the most distant filters). Filter changes may be done in parallel with a position
change.
3) Tile change overheads (not in ETC)
There are three components to the time taken to go from one tile to another.
i) Slewing/presetting in Az and Alt
ii) Acquiring the guide star
iii) Low order wavefront sensing (LOWFS) observation to update M2 position
each of which is addressed in turn below
i) The time to go to a new tile will depend on how far away it is in altitude and azimuth from the current position, and on the zenith distance. As for any alt-azimuth telescope at VISTA’s latitude one wants to minimise presets between objects with Dec < -24° to Dec > -24° and vice versa. Both alt and azimuth can accelerate at 0.5°/s^2 and max angular velocity is 2°/s, so it takes a 4-sec ramp-up to reach max angular velocity (and covers 4 deg in those 4 sec). The Cassegrain rotator is faster (1°/s^2 and 3.6°/s) so will hardly ever be the limiting overhead.
A small preset of 2º on-sky, in the worst case, can require a ~ 60° azimuth move if alt = 88°. Fortunately a more “typical” case at alt = 60° only requires a ~ 4° azimuth move. Assuming an acceleration of 0.5°/s^2 for 2.82 sec followed by equal and opposite (de)celeration at same rate, this will take ~ 5.84 seconds (a smoother algorithm may take a bit longer so ~10 sec is a more reasonable estimate). If the 2° is mostly in Altitude it will be somewhat quicker.
The “worst case” preset is a 270° azimuth move from SE to NE which has to go the long way round via W due to the cable wrap, and which will take ~140 seconds. These situations should be avoided, if at all possible, during scheduling.
ii) Checking and acquiring the new guide star will impose a short overhead of ~1 second.
iii) After a telescope slew giving a large (> 10°?) change in altitude there may be a need for a ~30-sec pause for one closed-loop low-order wavefront sensing (LOWFS) cycle to complete and update the M2 position before science observing re-starts.
All these numbers will be updated when there is sufficient experience with the on-sky behaviour of the real system.
4) Active Optics overheads (not in ETC)
A Low Order Wavefront Sensor (LOWFS) is used to update the position of the secondary mirror during observations, and needs data for a minimum time of ~30sec to smooth out seeing variations. The LOWFS can operate in parallel with science observations.
If the telescope is staying in one position for >/= ~30sec there is no associated overhead as the LOWFS exposures merely start just after and finish just before the science integrations finish.
However using the LOWFS in this basic mode implies a minimum time between jitter moves of ~30sec. If it is essential to jitter more often than every 30 sec, this can be done using open-loop M2 control, though a slight loss of image quality may result. With experience on sky we will learn that after tracking the same sky area for X minutes one needs to do an LOWFS update. The value of (probably X~15) will become clear during commissioning.
In case that image quality falls off more quickly, or that one wants to observe for longer than X minutes before presetting to a new part of the sky, the telescope would by have to stay where it was with the camera idle until the LOWFS has accumulated enough (~ 30sec) exposure time.
As an alternative the AO control system could be changed to internally coadd LOWFS frames to give the necessary exposure from shorter exposures with the star moving on the chip between exposures. This mode remains to be implemented and will then need to be tested on sky.
-----------------------
There is a VISTA Public Surveys discussion
forum Twiki
-----------------------
ESO pages on Public Surveys including VISTA
VISTA (ESO)
ESO
VISTA Public Surveys
ESO Survey Team Presentation on ESO Public Surveys - Dec 2007
|